What type of thinking should initial companies exercise when considering water supply?

In the context of water supply considerations for initial fire companies, effective decision-making typically involves looking at the broader operational context. Down-board thinking refers to assessing the situation and resources from a command perspective, taking into account the overall strategy and ensuring that water supply aligns with larger operational needs. This type of thinking allows incident commanders and their teams to anticipate future needs and resources based on the current situation, enabling them to act proactively rather than reactively.

This approach is crucial during incidents in suburban areas where water supply challenges can vary significantly due to the geography, infrastructure, and availability of hydrants. By considering water supply from a down-board perspective, initial companies can make strategic choices that enhance their effectiveness and safety during the incident.

In contrast, forward thinking usually focuses on immediate actions and outcomes, backward thinking analyzes past incidents to inform current strategies, while cross-board thinking might evaluate parallel operations or other departments' roles. While these methods may have their place, down-board thinking specifically addresses how to integrate water supply considerations into a comprehensive incident management strategy.